Why are we not talking about how the entire concept of a "rivalry" is dead in the water for the big boys? They've completely sold out. Look at the news. Oregon's got a QB battle with two guys who just got there, one from Nebraska. Colorado has 43 new transfers. Oklahoma State has 50. Fifty! What are you even rooting for at that point? It's a fantasy football roster assembled in a lab, not a team. There's no continuity, no history between the players and the school. How can you hate a team when half of it is brand new every single season? That's where we have it right. Our rivalries in the Pioneer League mean something because they're built on something. You know the guys across the line. You've seen them for three, four years. You remember the hits, the close games, the trash talk that actually has history behind it. It's not some mercenary who got a bigger NIL check to play somewhere else for a year. The soul of the game isn't in Athens or Eugene right now, it's getting traded like a stock portfolio. They've made it transactional, and you can't build a real, hate-filled rivalry on transactions. It's all just business. So when I see Georgia landing another five-star or Miami pulling in a Heisman dark horse from the portal, I just laugh. What's the trophy for? Best collective bargaining agreement? We play for actual pride, for guys who chose to build something here. Their "rivalries" are just corporate brand competitions now. Why are we not calling this what it is? The sport at the very top has become a hollow shell. It's not. It's just the sound of money. http...