This is exactly what they said about us back in the Mike Leach era when we were taking junir college transfers and overlooked kids nobody wanted. You think Wes Welker or Danny Amendola cared about "systems"? They learned on the fly and balled out. Cohesion is great until you're lining up with three-star recruits against a five-star who transferred in. You need players, period. I remember when we had to face Oklahoma with their loaded rosters every year, and we beat them with guys who had a chip on their shoulder. That "grind" you're so proud of often just means you're keeping players who aren't good enough to leave. Fifty transfers is a lot, I'll give you that, it sounds like a mess. But grabbing fifteen or twenty? That's how you patch holes fast. The game has changed. You can't just develop what you have if what you have isn't cutting it. Look at our 2008 team that almost won the whole thing. That wasn't just four-year guys. That was a mix. This purity test is nonsense. If those fifty guys at Oklahoma State are hungry, they'll learn gap integrity by September a lot faster than a guy who's been in your system for three years but just doesn't have the talent. I'd rather have a circus of athletes than a cohesive unit that gets pushed around. We saw what "development" alone got us in some of those Tommy Tuberville years. No thanks. Get players who can play.