You're overcomplicating this to sound smart. Yards per attempt is a junk stat for teams that can't finish drives. Who cares if you average eight yards a pop if you kick field goals all day? The real measure is points per possession, full stop. Your system is built on ball control, but you're glorifying downfield aggression. That's a contradiction. A check-down that moves the chains and burns clock is a winning play, not some failed deep shot that looks good on a spreadsheet. Red zone percentage is the only thing from your list that matters, and even that's dependent on a power run game, which your team lacks. Third-down conversion rate is a team stat, not a QB stat. A good back or a penalty bails out a bad quarterback all the time. And turnover-worthy play rate? Please. The only stat that counts is turnovers, not some subjective grade. Your whole argument is an excuse for a quarterback who makes flashy throws but loses games. A winning quarterback manages the game, protects the ball, and scores touchdowns. Everything else is noise for losers. Your program's best seasons came from efficient game managers, not gamblers. You're avocating for a style that gets you beat by disciplined teams every single time.