You Purdue folks always look for the easy answer, don't you? I watched your games last year. The problem wasn't your defensive line, it was a secondary that couldn't cover a bed with a blanket. Giving a quarterback time is one thing, but giving him wide-open receivers is a choice. I remember when we had a secondary that could actually play man coverage back in the late 80s, they made any pass rush look good. Your guys were lost out there. You can bring in all the edge transfers you want, but if your defensive backs are playing ten yards off on third and six, it doesn't matter if you get there in three seconds or five. The quarterback will already have thrown the ball. This fixation on a "havoc rate" is modern nonsense. Good teams have good players who make plays, period. Your front four had their moments, but when your coverage collapses instantly, no line in the country is getting home. You want a defensive line offenses fear? Start by recruiting defensive backs who don't fear getting beat on every snap. We saw this same song and dance for years in the old Big Ten. A soft secondary is a cancer that makes the whole defense look worse. Blaming the trenches is a cop-out.