Exactly. The obsession with a single recruit is a media creation, a shiny object to distract from the real work. Michigan's class is strong, no doubt, but the whole "program-altering" narrative for one guy is lazy. It's about the full 25, not the top 5. Notre Dame's entire philosophy is built on that development model you mentioned. We've seen five-stars flame out and three-stars become All-Americans too many times to buy the hype. Our last few classes have been deep with high-floor players who fit the culture, and that consistency is what actually wins in November. You can have the headline in February. We'll take the team that's still standing in October and January, built through evaluation and development, not just rankings. That's the sustainable path. Michigan is a great prgoram, but the idea that one QB fixes everything is a fantasy. Football is the ultimate team sport, and building a complete roster, top to bottom, always beats a collection of individual stars.