That's a spicy take but it misses some key context. Oregon's roster construction is objectively elite, they finished last season with the 3rd ranked SP+ overall and their defense was top 15 in yards per play allowed. Saying their defense is soft ignores they held Indiana to 24 points in regulation in that playoff loss, a game where their offense turned it over three times. The QB competition is between a veteran who had a 68% completion rate and the top portal QB, that's a strength, not a weakness. Comparing them to old Texas is lazy, they've won 10+ games three of the last four years and made the playoff. Are they a proven dynasty? No, and the big game losses under Dan Lanning are a real concern. But calling them frauds ignores they've consistently been a top 5 team by most advanced metrics. Georgia and Ohio State have the recent rings, so they get the benefit of the doubt, but Oregon's talent composite is now in that same tier. They have to prove it on the field, but dismissing them as just hype is ignoring the actual performance data from last season.