This reminds me of the 2006 season when everyone crowned the Big Ten before the bowls, and then we saw what happened. The SEC's top end, year after year, proves itelf when it matters. You think the committee will suddenly ignore decades of that reality? They might get one, but both? That's the kind of wishful thinking we heard before the Rose Bowl in '91, and we all know how that turned out. The grind down south still means something, whether folks up north want to admit it or not.