This is exactly the kind of lazy take I'd expect from someone who doesn't understand our program. You're looking at last year's stats for Vanderbilt and trying to apply them to us, but our offense doesn't work like that. We run the triple option, and red zone efficiency is about execution and physicality, not just dropping back and throwing. Ranking 112th in a spread offense has zero bearing on how we operate inside the 20. For us, it's about the fullback dive, the quarterback keep, and wearing down the defensive front. Both Berlowitz and Curtis understand that the playbook tightens up down there, and it's about who makes the right read. We led the American in time of possession last year because we control the game, and that control is most critical in the red zone. To suggest our quarterback battle depends on fixing a problem from a completely different system at Vanderbilt is just ignorant. Our issue last year was turnovers at bad times, not a failure to scheme touchdowns. Whoever takes the snaps will be drilled on ball security and decision-making above all else. We don't need to "fix" anything from Vanderbilt's playbook, we need to execute ours better. And we will.